Spirit & Soul in Learning: Persuasive Speaking Seminar Syllabus Design
Spirit & Soul in Learning: Persuasive Speaking
Seminar Syllabus Design
Persuasive Speaking Seminar
Group Members |
Roles* |
Commented On: |
Logan Marlatt |
Group Leader - Logan organized the meetings and kept us motivated Course Content Creator - Logan produced all the content related to persuasive speaking
and handled most of the syllabus content |
Group 2 & 4 |
Brenna Capon |
Aggregation & Organization - Brenna organized the content into the syllabus
document and edited the preliminary and concluding paragraphs Theoretical Application - Brenna documented the correlation between planned activities
& the main theoretical points related to Spirit & Soul in Learning in
the table. |
Group 1 & 2 |
*Our group was small and worked well together so we both
contributed to all syllabus design areas. These roles represent how we
initially divided tasks, but we overlapped significantly.
Introduction
Persuasive Speaking
Seminary is a six-day course for adults wanting to learn about persuasive
speaking. The purpose of the course is to provide students with instruction
about the practical and theoretical concepts related to public speaking so they
can become confident and convincing public speakers. Topics include persuasive
theory, dealing with speech anxiety, credibility & emotional appeals,
perception of language, and audience analysis. Besides instruction on the
mechanics of effective public speaking, we want students to learn to
communicate in a way that connects them both with their inner self and their
peers as a community. In this way, we hope to address both the spirit and soul
in learning about public speaking.
Rationale
Spirit and Soul in Learning
Using spirit and soul as
a framework for learning has been a rather recent development and the concept
can elude definition. Mackracher (2004) describes the soul as the “essence of
being through which we experience life and self” (p. 80) and explains that this
is the inwardly focused aspect of the learner. The spirit is the part of us
that is “connected to aspects of the external world that are of value to me –
to others, to the earth, and to a greater cosmic being (Davis, 2002; Tisdell,
1999) which is an outward-focused element of the learner. Learning that is
attuned to spirit and soul incorporates the internal and external aspects of
education, and allows learners to better explore themselves and their place in
the world.
Facilitating Spirit and
Soul in Learning
While the spirit and
soul are abstract ideas, there are concrete ways to facilitate learning with
these intangibles in view. The soul cannot be taught as much as nurtured
(Dirkx, 1997). Since the soul is developed when there is time and space for
reflection, it is important to start with an environment that fosters feelings
of comfort and openness (Groen, 2004). Because soul learning involves images
and responses, learning activities that include humor, poetry, storytelling,
and the arts are beneficial (Dirkx, 1997). Spiritual learning often works best
as an extension of soulful learning. When a student has contemplated their
internal responses and connections to an experience, they can dialogue with
other students to understand how they fit into their learning community and how
they can find common values and belonging. This works best when the emphasis is
not on the group finding predetermined answers, but on the interpretive
discussion of ideas with a variety of people (Haroutunian-Gordon, 2009).
Spiritual learning activities encourage students to link what takes place in
the classroom to their life outside the classroom and to look for connections
between those experiences and their responses to imagery and symbols
(MacKeracher, 2004). Learners engage in soulful and spiritual learning when
they embrace opportunities that come from areas that they ordinarily would not
engage in and when they are “open to a transformation” (Mudge, 2021, p. 53).
The key for most educators will not be found by selecting the right activities.
The greatest impact will happen when the educator engages in personal
development of the soul and spirit that brings them to the place of seeing
their role as drawing out the person and potential in their students rather than
the answers (Astin, 2004).
Applying the Spirit and
Soul Framework
The concepts of spirit
and soul in learning can be applied in numerous ways in the adult education
setting, though it is critical to remember that the end result depends upon
whether or not students are willing to engage in the process. Three key areas
where instructors can give consideration when creating a favorable setting for
spiritual and soulful learning are environment, classroom activities, and
instructional approach. Instructors can begin by creating a physical classroom
that makes students feel like they are in a safe and open environment (Dirkx,
1997). This could mean anything from a casual seating arrangement to creating a
judgment-free zone during class discussions. After a conducive setting has been
established, instructors can choose activities and assignments that focus on
reflection, dialogue, and openness- like keeping a journal and reading the
entries aloud to others. Educators can find ways to incorporate poetry, storytelling,
metaphor, humor, or other topics that provoke personal responses to images into
their content (MacKeracher, 2004). Finally, the teacher who wants a healthy
spiritual environment for students will take an instructional approach that
focuses on learning rather than teaching, which shifts the focus from what the
instructor is doing to what the students are experiencing (Astin, 2004). While
the spirit and soul may not be able to be at the forefront of every lesson or
class meeting, instructors can make huge strides by simply considering how to
approach themselves and their students as complex and complete human beings.
Persuasive Speaking in
The Spirit and Soul Framework
With this concept of
spirit and soul in mind, we chose the topic of persuasive speaking because both
of these parts can be emphasized in persuasive speaking due to its unique focus
on personal reflection and interpersonal connection. We selected methods and
activities in our syllabus that use imagery to prompt response and offer time and
space for reflection as a way to nurture the soul towards finding its voice.
For example, one lesson begins with the presentation of a collage of images of
famous people giving speeches. Students are invited to reflect on the collage
and choose one person and what made their speaking memorable. This invites
students to process their internal reaction to a symbol and to connect that
response to external values and greater causes that resonate with the student.
Since a judgment-free zone is critical to soulful and spiritual learning, time
is spent on discussing how to analyze your audience and consider their
potential responses when writing speeches. Students do exercises to familiarize
them with the impact their words can have in making others feel comfortable
enough to dialogue, which is when real spiritual growth can happen. Lessons
also incorporate stories, humor, and metaphors from outside the classroom
experience to help students connect the content to life outside the classroom
walls.
While the primary
objectives of the lessons are related to equipping students to speak
persuasively, we also focused on facilitating soulful and spiritual learning by
framing the content in settings that give attention to the intangible dimension
of the student experience. We know that the spirit and soul cannot be made to
learn, but we also believe that the way we present and apply the content can
have a significant impact on growth in these areas.
Syllabus
Class Meetings
Persuasive Speaking
Seminar will meet Monday, Wednesday, and Friday from 9:00 am - Noon during the
two weeks before the beginning of the fall term.
Course Objectives
- Students
should be able to analyze and adapt to their audiences.
- Students
should be able to select persuasive topics and arguments that will be
relevant to their audience.
- Students
will construct and organize their speeches according to the persuasive
structures that are outlined both in class and in the textbook.
- Students
will be able to argue for and defend their persuasive topic within their
speech.
- Students
will utilize vivid and detailed language to help persuade their audience.
- Students
will be able to speak confidently for any persuasive speech occasion.
- Students
will be able to provide constructive feedback to peers on content and the application
of speech methods.
- Students
will be able to construct a self-evaluation based on persuasive speaking
principles.
Course Schedule
Day 1 |
Readings/Videos |
Assignments |
Due
Dates |
|
Chapters 1 and 3 of Fundamentals
of Public Communication. TED-Ed video on speech
anxiety: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K93fMnFKwfI |
Survey: Students will
take a short survey on speech anxiety where they can freely and anonymously
state how nervous or unsure they are about public speaking. Instructors can
then look at the information and further adapt the material to help address
some of these concerns that are raised. |
Survey due on Day 2 |
Activities Introductions: Students
will introduce themselves and state if they have had public speaking
experience before. Speech Anxiety: Students will discuss what parts of public speaking they may have difficulty with, and are encouraged to think about what they would like to learn to improve upon these fears. Speech Anxiety PowerPoint Principles of Public
Speaking: PowerPoint presentation will be used as a guide to explore the
ideas of thesis statements, speech purpose, etc. Principles of Public Speaking PowerPoint |
|||
Day 2 |
Readings/Videos |
Assignments |
Due
Dates |
|
Chapters 5 and 12 of Fundamentals
of Public Communication. |
Speech Plan: Students
will be tasked with filling out a worksheet that will detail their plans for
a persuasive speech. Students will need to determine what their topic is and
what visual supplements they may need to provide to further enhance their
presentation. |
Speech Plan due on Day
3 |
Activities Audience Analysis: Students will conduct audience analysis surveys in small groups to make sure that the speech topics they create will be acceptable for their audience. Audience Analysis PowerPoint Language and Perception: Students will also practice giving a speech on a specific topic by utilizing more vivid and detail-oriented word usage. The goal of this activity is to introduce students to the concept of word usage being paramount in laying the foundation for a persuasive speech. Perceptions of Language PowerPoint |
|||
Day 3 |
Readings/Videos |
Assignments |
Due
Dates |
|
Chapter 13 of Fundamentals
of Public Communication. Prior insight from previous chapters and
assignments may also be referenced. |
Revised Speech Plan: instructors
will have analyzed the form that students completed regarding their speech
plans. Instructors will make comments on what areas or aspects students
should improve upon. Students will then submit an updated draft of their
ideas. |
Revised Speech Plan
due on Day 4 |
Activities Toulmin’s Model: Students will engage in a discussion on Toulmin’s model. For this activity, students will listen to a story and must argue for which characters they feel are the best or worst in the story, and provide reasoning for doing so. This will involve the use of both persuasive appeals and the knowledge they have gained regarding argumentative reasoning from the textbook. Toulmin's Model PowerPoint |
|||
Day 4 |
Readings/Videos |
Assignments |
Due
Dates |
|
Video on the concept
of Outlining: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpRi65RNElE&t=152s Students will watch
video examples of previous persuasive speeches. Example of a persuasive
speech: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYtm8uEo5vU |
Speech Outline:
Students will create and submit an outline for their persuasive speech. This
outline will detail what points they will be touching upon and what their
persuasive arguments will look like. Students are not expected to remember
these outlines completely, but rather use them as a reference point while
giving their speech. |
Speech outline to be
submitted when giving speech on Day 5 or 6 |
Activities Speech Workshop Day:
This class will be devoted to the implementation of principles that were
given in the three prior days as the students construct their speeches in a
workshop format. Students will construct and present portions of their
speeches in small groups and provide each other feedback for improvement
based on previous instruction. |
|||
Day 5/6 |
Readings/Videos |
Assignments |
Due
Dates |
|
No materials will be
required. |
Reflection: Students
will write a reflection on persuasive speaking and what they feel they have
accomplished from this experience, and what they could do differently in the
future. |
Reflective Journal due
one week after last class meeting |
Activities Speech Presentation:
Students will conduct and perform their speeches in front of their peers and
the instructor. This is the culmination of the work that students have
engaged in throughout the week. By the end of their speeches, students will
hopefully be more well-adjusted to the idea of public speaking and persuasively
arguing for a point they may feel strongly about. |
Textbook
Title: Fundamentals of
Public Communication
Author: Richard Nitcavic
Videos & PowerPoints
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K93fMnFKwfI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpRi65RNElE&t=152s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYtm8uEo5vU
All PowerPoint files are adapted from the Ball State University “Comm 210”
presentation material
Grading Criteria and
Standards
Assignment Submission
Policy
- All
assignments should be submitted as PDF or Word documents with extensions
of .doc, docx, or pdf. Therefore, Google Docs, Apple Pages, or other
formats other than Microsoft .doc,.docx, or pdf will not be accepted for
full credit. Current BSU students can download FREE versions of
Microsoft at:
- Assignments,
unless otherwise indicated, should be submitted using the assignment
submission link for the assignment.
- If an
assignment is not properly submitted using the proper extension late
penalties (per the late policy) will be applied. This includes speech
outlines.
Speech Time Limits
Due to the nature of the
speaking assignments, the number of students in each section, and the number of
speeches required, time limits for each speech have been determined.
- You must
learn to plan for a certain time; you must learn to recognize your “expansion”
rate from outline to notes and the possibility that your nerves may cause
you to speak faster than you might normally.
- You must
realize that the time accorded you is not a gift of the audience, but an
expectation.
- Because of
the short speaking time in class, going over the set time limit takes
away from the speaking time of other students who are ready to speak
that day.
- In the same
way, overtime takes away time for questions and criticism from the
class and the instructor.
- Therefore,
speeches not meeting the minimum required time or exceeding the maximum
time required will have 2% of their final points deducted for each full
15-second interval under or over time.
- At the
instructor’s discretion, you may be asked to stop your speech if you are exceeding
the allotted time frame. Asking you to stop is designed to ensure that all
students assigned to speak that day have the time to do so.
Grade Weighting
The course grade will be as follows:
·
Readings & Daily
Assignments - 25%
·
Speech - 25%
·
Personal Reflection
& Peer Evaluations - 50%
Attendance Policy
In class, you will meet three
days per week with your small section instructor. In class, you will discuss
course content in more depth, do activities, and deliver your speeches.
·
Attendance is mandatory
and you are expected to be present and on time for each class.
·
If you fail to arrive on
time, you will be responsible for any information, quizzes, notes, or
announcements you missed.
·
Absences will only be
excused with a doctor’s note, legitimate documentation, or a
university-sanctioned event excuse notice.
·
All students deserve an
audience for their speeches. Therefore, if a student misses a day during
which speeches are being presented, they will lose 10% off of their speech
grade for each speech day missed. Further, disrespectful or disruptive
behavior on speech days will result in your dismissal from class that day,
being marked absent, and/or the loss of the same 10% as those not in
attendance.
Reflection
What makes our syllabus
stand out is how the application of the spirit and soul framework shifts the
focus. We planned our syllabus with the goal of creating a community between
all members of the classroom, rather than a hierarchy centered around the instructor
(Tisdell, 1999). This means our lesson planning started with the students in
mind and then moved to how we desired for students to interact with content. It
also meant that our evaluation shifted to what happened to the internal being
of the student and not merely what happened on an external assessment. We are
very proud of the way our syllabus acknowledged the dignity and complexity of
our students as humans and projected an energetic and welcoming
environment.
Process
We began this process by
meeting over Zoom to discuss the assignment and the new roles for each group
member since our group was down to two members. We spent considerable time
reviewing previous groups’ projects and the assignment details to make sure we both
had the same understanding of the task related to our topic. Once we felt like
we were both on the same page about the goal, we discussed what to use for the
content of our syllabus. Given our previous experiences, strengths/weaknesses,
and framework, we decided to teach a seminar on persuasive speaking. We divided
tasks from there and began to work independently. We collaborated through a
Google document and messaging, using comments to revise and update our syllabus
document. Finally, we met again to collaborate on pulling our parts of the
project together. We reviewed each other’s contributions, made improvements to
our plan, and edited the syllabus for coherence. We spent most of the last
meeting session determining how to document our application of the framework in
the construction of the syllabus. After the meeting, we both had more edits to
make so we planned to finish those independently, edit again, and post our
project. Some things we learned include the value of a team spirit and the
necessity of clarification about the goal. Also, taking time to determine each
group member’s strengths and weaknesses, as well as preferred roles in group
work, makes the overall process smooth. Reading the instructions thoroughly and
reviewing previous students’ work is of inestimable value. Also, using the
literature review as the basis for the syllabus saves time.
Tables:
Since spirit & soul
must be nurtured and not coerced in learning, and outcomes rely heavily on
learner receptivity, our aims are all directed at fostering a climate that is
conducive to human flourishing. We have organized our efforts into the three
categories and their respective subcategories as shown below. Assignments,
activities, and syllabus design choices are keyed to these aims in the table
that follows.
b. Fosters awareness, community, and belonging
c. Is warm and inviting, open and transformative
d. Discourages judgmental responses to self and others, while encouraging consideration of personal beliefs & values
2. Activity Selection
b. Involves reflection, imagination, sharing, and dialogue
c. Allows for higher states of consciousness
d. Uses contexts that connect above and beyond the classroom
3. Instructional Approach
a. Views instructor as mediator rather than authority
b. Focuses on idea mediation, not answer-finding
c. Values transformation over information
d. Has a gentle pace with an emphasis on cooperation
Aims we wish to achieve with our design |
Main theoretical ideas |
Main activities in our syllabus |
Main methods/tools/strategies in our syllabus |
3a - Views instructor
as mediator rather than authority 3c - Values
transformation over information |
The teacher who wants
a healthy spiritual environment for students will embrace a focus on learning
rather than teaching, which shifts the focus from what the instructor is
doing to what the students are experiencing (Astin, 2004).
|
Day 1 Speech Survey |
The first assignment
of the class is to fill out a survey that asks students about their
experiences and attitudes about public speaking. The purpose of this survey
is to provide the instructor with feedback so they can tailor the course to
the needs of their students, rather than just always teaching the same
content. This forces the instructor to think about the students and their
growth as primary rather than the topics. |
1b - Fosters
awareness, community, and belonging 2a - Includes imagery,
poetry, storytelling, metaphor, and arts 1d - discourages
judgment, encourages value assessment |
This spiritual element
of a learner constructs knowledge through symbols and impressions rather than
facts and logic (Dirkx, 1997). Spiritual learning
invites students to enter into a relationship with others in ever-increasing
concentric circles working outward until they feel a part of something
greater than themselves (Tisdell, 1999). |
Day 2 Speech Plan |
For the speech plan,
students are asked to consider what visual aids will help them make their point
in their speech. This requirement engages the student in reflection on which
images resonate with them related to their topic. They also have to consider
the greater community of the classroom and make sure that their visual aid
connects with others in the class, too. Choosing a topic and writing a plan
also requires a student to reflect on what they believe and value to the
point that they desire to persuade others to agree. |
2d - Uses contexts
that connect above and beyond the classroom 2c - Allows for higher
states of consciousness |
Spiritual learning
activities encourage students to link what takes place in the classroom to
their life outside the classroom and to look for connections between those
experiences and their responses to imagery and symbols (MacKeracher,
2004). Learners must achieve
an altered state of consciousness for spiritual learning (MacKeracher,
2010). |
Day 2 Audience Analysis
& Language Perception |
The PowerPoint
presentations for these topics include several slides of images (logos, pop
culture references, identity group symbols) that bring the outside life of
students into the conversation. When doing the
activities on language perception, students are asked philosophical questions
like, “What is language?” that prompt higher states of awareness through
focused attention on intangible realities. They are also asked to draw a dog
and consider what is essential to the concept of “dog,” which similarly draws
attention to deeper meanings than are normally considered when using words. |
1d - Discourages
judgmental responses to self and others, while encouraging consideration of
personal beliefs & values 3b - Focuses on idea
mediation, not answer-finding |
Spiritual learning is
more effective for those who refrain from judgment of their experiences
(MacKeracher, 2010). Small group
discussions where the teacher is a facilitator and not an arbiter of the flow
of conversation, even amid conflict, are a key component of spiritual
development (Dirkx, 1997). |
Day 3 Toulmin’s Model
Activity |
During the Toulmin’s
Model activity, students are asked to read a fable aloud with each group
member reading the lines of one character. Each member then argues for which
character is the best or worst. In order to 1) foster an environment of
dialogue and not problem-solving, and 2) discourage heated responses,
students are advised by the instructor to remember that this is a fictional
account and that there isn’t an objectively “best” and “worst” person. |
1c - Is warm and
inviting, open and transformative |
Learners must be “open
to a transformation” (Mudge, 2021). |
Day 3 Revised Plan |
Students are asked to
revise their speech plans based on constructive feedback from the instructor.
This exercise pushes students to be willing to change and transform their
thinking when receiving input from others in a helpful setting, even if it
challenges their thinking or pushes them outside their comfort zone. |
3d - Has a gentle pace
with an emphasis on cooperation 1d - Discourages
judgmental responses to self and others, while encouraging consideration of
personal beliefs & values |
Spiritual learning
works best when the emphasis is not on the group finding pre-determined
answers, but on the interpretive discussion of ideas with a variety of people
(Haroutunian-Gordon, 2009). Spiritual learning
requires a community, rather than a hierarchy centered around the instructor
(Tisdell, 1999) |
Day 4 Speech Workshop |
During the Speech
Workshop, students will try out parts of their speech in small groups. Group
members will offer each other feedback and perspectives to help students make
improvements. This shifts the focus from competition and performance to a
cooperative effort towards success. The workshop will be casual with students
arranged in comfortable seating and encouraged to do whatever they need to
feel comfortable practicing their speeches. Students are encouraged to offer
and receive feedback with humility and vulnerability. |
1a - Space for
contemplation and reflection |
Education that is
attentive to the spirit of the learner focuses on heightened awareness,
exposure to new ideas, making connections, dialogue, reflection, and
acceptance (MacKeracher, 2004). It is recommended that
students should engage in journal writing (Mackeracher, 2010) to get the most
out of their experience. |
Day 5/6 Reflection
assignment |
Having students
reflect on their speeches after the fact communicates the value of revisiting
experiences to learn more about ourselves and what we value, to remember that
we are a work in progress and this class is not the end of our growth.
“How can I improve?” “Do I feel like I am an effective persuasive speaker?”
“Do I want to be?” These types of prompts cause a person to think about
themselves and not just persuasive speech. |
2b - Involves
reflection, imagination, sharing, and dialogue |
Instructors and
learners must allow themselves to heighten their states of consciousness by
engaging in activities such as the sharing of dreams, images, or word
association activities (MacKeracher, 2010). |
Question of the Day
Lesson Openers |
Each class day begins
with a “Question of the Day” activity that invites students to engage with an
image or word in a personal and reflective way before sharing their thoughts
with others. These are open-ended questions so students have a low-stakes
opportunity to engage their imagination and experiences in a community. |
1c - Is warm and
inviting, open and transformative 3c - Values
transformation over information |
The key for most
educators will not be found by selecting the right activities. The greatest
impact will happen when the educator sees their role as drawing out the
person and potential in their students rather than the answers (Astin, 2004). |
Grade Weighting |
We have intentionally
chosen to weigh our grading heavily towards the activities that are
reflective and transformative, rather than emphasizing the ones that assess
content and answers. The latter things are important, but we believe that
personal reflection and constructive interaction with peers are more
valuable. |
References
Astin, A. W. (2004). Why
spirituality deserves a central place in liberal education. Liberal
Education, 90(2), 34.
Bhatia, A., & Kapur,
P. (2018). From personal experiences to classroom teaching: A socio-psychological
study of social inclusion and exclusion. Journal of Psychosocial Research,
13(1),141–151. https://doi.org/10.32381/jpr.2018.13.01.15
Dirkx, J. M. (1997).
Nurturing soul in adult learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing
Education, 1997(74), 79-88. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.7409
Groen, J. (2004). The
creation of soulful spaces: An exploration of the processes and the
organizational context. Organization Development Journal, 22(3),
8–19.
Haroutunian-Gordon, S.
(2009). Learning to Teach Through Discussion: The Art of Turning the Soul.
New Haven: Yale University Press. https://doi-org.proxy.bsu.edu/10.12987/9780300155822
Lawson, K. (2011). The
trainer's handbook of leadership development tools, techniques, and activities.
Pfeiffer.
MacKeracher, D. (2004). Making
Sense of Adult Learning (2nd Edition). University of Toronto Press. https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com/books/9781442690493
Mudge, P. (2021). This changes everything. The
COVID-19 pandemic: An opportunity for cultivating a fresh approach to
spirituality? Australasian Catholic Record, 98(1), 42– 53.
Plater, M. (2017). Re-soulingthe spirituality: redefining the spiritual
dimension in schools. International Journal of Children’s Spirituality,
22(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364436X.2016.1268097
Tisdell, E. J. (1999). The spiritual dimension
of adult development. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education,
1999(84), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.8410
Tolliver, D. E., &
Tisdell, E. J. (2006). Engaging spirituality in the transformative higher
education classroom. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2006(109),
37-47. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.206
The clarity and detail provided at the beginning of this project is really impressive! There is really clear descriptions provided in both the paragraphs and the charts. The syllabus is a bit shorter than what I have noticed in other groups but the detail seems just as good for the shorter seminar style. I think you all provided a great example on the class content with the process and reflection sections as well. Thanks for sharing the different style of example!
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading your syllabus design! I thought you two picked great activities to increase your students comfort levels with speaking to help them reduce their speech anxiety. There are so many people that struggle with public speaking that would greatly benefit from taking your class. I also liked how you emphasized the importance of creating a safe and comfortable environment for your classroom because that is important in all aspects of learning. I wish your syllabus included a few more activities. Overall, you two did a great job!
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed the detail of your syllabus design. I like the idea of getting the participants to become familiar with each other and comfortable before focusing on the material. I believe that would benefit a course requiring speaking in front of the others. I am impressed you did this all with two members. The amount of work you put into it was evident. Thank you for sharing.
ReplyDeleteHello Group 3!
ReplyDeleteThe details and purpose behind every assignment and activity are very apparent throughout your syllabus design. I liked that you gradually introduce students to a full speech during their time in the course and allow them the opportunity to interact with one another through group activities. I also appreciated the opening survey you have them complete on speech anxiety; this shows a sense of care and you'll be able to meet students where they are with this knowledge. Public communication can be an intimidating topic, but this syllabus contains approachable assignments and encourages a sense of community within the classroom. Great job!
- Lauren Means
Hi everyone!
ReplyDeleteI loved this syllabus! There was so much attention to detail, and I feel that it was very functional and could easily be utilized for a course on campus. I really liked the tackling of anxiety when it comes to public speaking, as that was one of my biggest fears when I went into my public speaking class.
You all did amazing!
Lyston