Posts

Final Showcase

Image
Final Showcase Presentation Videos- Spirit and Soul in Learning Group Members Roles Commented On: Logan Marlatt We each did our own final showcase Group 4 Brenna Capon We each did our own final showcase   Group2 and Group 1     Implementation Video Reflection Video  

Final Showcase

Image
  Spirit & Soul in Learning Final Showcase - Persuasive Speaking Seminar Group Members Roles Commented On: Logan Marlatt We each did our own final showcase Group 4 Brenna Capon We each did our own final showcase   Group 2 and Group 1  Brenna Capon - Implementation Video References Astin, A. W. (2004). Why spirituality deserves a central place in liberal education.  Liberal     Education, 90 (2), 34. Bhatia, A., & Kapur, P. (2018). From personal experiences to classroom teaching: A socio-psychological study of social inclusion and exclusion.  Journal of Psychosocial Research ,  13 (1),141–151.  https://doi.org/10.32381/jpr.2018.13.01.15 Dirkx, J. M. (1997). Nurturing soul in adult learning.  New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 1997 (74), 79-88.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.7409 Groen, J. (2004). The creation of soulful spaces: An exploration of the processes and the organizational context.  Organization Development Journal ,  22 (3), 8–19. Haroutunian-Gordon, S. (

Spirit & Soul in Learning: Persuasive Speaking Seminar Syllabus Design

  Spirit & Soul in Learning: Persuasive Speaking Seminar Syllabus Design Persuasive Speaking Seminar   Group Members Roles* Commented On: Logan Marlatt Group Leader - Logan organized the meetings and kept us motivated Course Content Creator - Logan produced all the content related to persuasive speaking and handled most of the syllabus content Group 2 & 4 Brenna Capon Aggregation & Organization - Brenna organized the content into the syllabus document and edited the preliminary and concluding paragraphs Theoretical Application - Brenna documented the correlation between planned activities & the main theoretical points related to Spirit & Soul in Learning in the table.  Group 1 & 2 *Our group was small and worked well together so we both contributed to all syllabus design areas. These roles represent how we initially divided tasks, but we overla